|
The survey was prepared for the Economist's "World in 2005"
publication, with the remit: "Where will be the best place to live in
2005?"
Researchers took into account not just income, but other factors
considered important to people's satisfaction and well-being.
They included health, freedom, unemployment, family life, climate,
political stability and security, gender equality and family and
community life.
The Economist said: "Ireland wins because it successfully combines
the most desirable elements of the new, such as low unemployment and
political liberties, with the preservation of certain cosy elements of
the old, such as stable family and community life."
The magazine admits that measuring quality of life is not a
straightforward thing to do, and that its findings will have their
critics - "except, of course, in Ireland".
Breakdown in Britain
The Republic has made significant gains from its membership of the EU,
earning the soubriquet Celtic Tiger for its economic progress.
Commentators say it is widely admired by the EU's newest members, and
has become a model for what they hope to achieve.
Although European nations generally do well in the survey, the
continent's major industrial powers of France, Germany and Britain
finish 25th, 26th and 29th respectively.
The researchers said although the UK achieved high income per head,
it had high levels of social and family breakdown.
The worst of the 111 countries to live in was considered to be
Zimbabwe, "where things have gone from bad to worse under [President]
Robert Mugabe".
Courtesy BBC News Online

 |